美国首字母B喜剧片 - 第4页

Translation

Personal insights The Interpretability of Artificial Intelligence and the Impact of Outcome Feedback on Trust: A Comparative Study | Xue Zhirong's knowledge base Robots and digital humans Xue Zhirong is a designer, engineer, and author of several books; Founder of the Design Open Source Community, Co-founder of MiX Copilot; Committed to making the world a better place with design and technology. This knowledge base will update AI, HCI and other content, including news, papers, presentations, sharing, etc. To assess trust more accurately, the researchers used behavioral trust (WoA), a measure that takes into account the difference between the user's predictions and the AI's recommendations, and is independent of the model's accuracy. By comparing WoA under different conditions, researchers can analyze the relationship between trust and performance. To assess trust more accurately, the researchers used behavioral trust (WoA), a measure that takes into account the difference between the user's predictions and the AI's recommendations, and is independent of the model's accuracy. By comparing WoA under different conditions, researchers can analyze the relationship between trust and performance. Xue Zhirong's knowledge base solution Q1: How does feedback affect users' trust in AI? Original address: Based on large language model generation, there may be a risk of errors.

The Interpretability of Artificial Intelligence and the Impact of Outcome Feedback on Trust: A Comparative Study | Xue Zhirong's knowledge base

interview The Interpretability of Artificial Intelligence and the Impact of Outcome Feedback on Trust: A Comparative Study The Interpretability of Artificial Intelligence and the Impact of Outcome Feedback on Trust: A Comparative Study thesis artificial intelligence Interview Problem finding To assess trust more accurately, the researchers used behavioral trust (WoA), a measure that takes into account the difference between the user's predictions and the AI's recommendations, and is independent of the model's accuracy. By comparing WoA under different conditions, researchers can analyze the relationship between trust and performance. Q3: How does result feedback and model interpretability affect user task performance? The results show that feedback has a more significant impact on improving users' trust in AI than explainability, but this enhanced trust does not lead to a corresponding performance improvement. Further exploration suggests that feedback induces users to over-trust (i.e., accept the AI's suggestions when it is wrong) or distrust (ignore the AI's suggestions when it is correct), which may negate the benefits of increased trust, leading to a "trust-performance paradox". The researchers call for future research to focus on how to design strategies to ensure that explanations foster appropriate trust to improve the efficiency of human-robot collaboration. Interactive thesis Conference outcome MIT Licensed | Copyright © 2024-present Zhirong Xue's knowledge base Dissertation Summary Xue Zhirong is a designer, engineer, and author of several books; Founder of the Design Open Source Community, Co-founder of MiX Copilot; Committed to making the world a better place with design and technology. This knowledge base will update AI, HCI and other content, including news, papers, presentations, sharing, etc. Problem finding speech speech solution The Interpretability of Artificial Intelligence and the Impact of Outcome Feedback on Trust: A Comparative Study About me Original address: outcome Translation The researchers found that although it is generally believed that the interpretability of the model can help improve the user's trust in the AI system, in the actual experiment, the global and local interpretability does not lead to a stable and significant trust improvement. Conversely, feedback (i.e., the output of the results) has a more significant effect on increasing user trust in the AI. However, this increased trust does not directly translate into an equivalent improvement in performance.

Personal insights

interview Xue Zhirong, Designer, Interaction Design, Human-Computer Interaction, Artificial Intelligence, Official Website, Blog, Creator, Author, Engineer, Paper, Product Design, Research, AI, HCI, Design, Learning, Knowledge Base, xuezhirong, UX, Design, Research, AI, HCI, Designer, Engineer, Author, Blog, Papers, Product Design, Study, Learning, User Experience outcome The results show that feedback has a more significant impact on improving users' trust in AI than explainability, but this enhanced trust does not lead to a corresponding performance improvement. Further exploration suggests that feedback induces users to over-trust (i.e., accept the AI's suggestions when it is wrong) or distrust (ignore the AI's suggestions when it is correct), which may negate the benefits of increased trust, leading to a "trust-performance paradox". The researchers call for future research to focus on how to design strategies to ensure that explanations foster appropriate trust to improve the efficiency of human-robot collaboration. The researchers conducted two sets of experiments ("Predict the speed-dating outcomes and get up to $6 (takes less than 20 min)" and a similar Prolific experiment) in which participants interacted with the AI system in a task of predicting the outcome of a dating to explore the impact of model explainability and feedback on user trust in AI and prediction accuracy. The results show that although explainability (e.g., global and local interpretation) does not significantly improve trust, feedback can most consistently and significantly improve behavioral trust. However, increased trust does not necessarily lead to the same level of performance gains, i.e., there is a "trust-performance paradox". Exploratory analysis reveals the mechanisms behind this phenomenon. About me To assess trust more accurately, the researchers used behavioral trust (WoA), a measure that takes into account the difference between the user's predictions and the AI's recommendations, and is independent of the model's accuracy. By comparing WoA under different conditions, researchers can analyze the relationship between trust and performance. Robots and digital humans Original address: Problem finding The content is made up of: The Interpretability of Artificial Intelligence and the Impact of Outcome Feedback on Trust: A Comparative Study Dissertation Summary A3: The study found that the feedback of the results can improve the accuracy of the user's predictions (reducing the absolute error), thereby improving the performance of working with AI. However, interpretability does not have as much impact on user task performance as it does on trust. This may mean that we should pay more attention to how to effectively use feedback mechanisms to improve the usefulness and effectiveness of AI-assisted decision-making. Personal insights speech

The Interpretability of Artificial Intelligence and the Impact of Outcome Feedback on Trust: A Comparative Study | Xue Zhirong's knowledge base

interview 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010

Based on large language model generation, there may be a risk of errors.

interview artificial intelligence A2: Although it is generally believed that the explanatory nature of the model helps to improve user trust, the experimental results show that this enhancement is not significant and not as effective as feedback. In specific cases, such as areas of low expertise, some form of interpretation may result in only a modest increase in appropriate trust. Dissertation Summary Q3: How does result feedback and model interpretability affect user task performance? Based on large language model generation, there may be a risk of errors. A2: Although it is generally believed that the explanatory nature of the model helps to improve user trust, the experimental results show that this enhancement is not significant and not as effective as feedback. In specific cases, such as areas of low expertise, some form of interpretation may result in only a modest increase in appropriate trust. The results show that feedback has a more significant impact on improving users' trust in AI than explainability, but this enhanced trust does not lead to a corresponding performance improvement. Further exploration suggests that feedback induces users to over-trust (i.e., accept the AI's suggestions when it is wrong) or distrust (ignore the AI's suggestions when it is correct), which may negate the benefits of increased trust, leading to a "trust-performance paradox". The researchers call for future research to focus on how to design strategies to ensure that explanations foster appropriate trust to improve the efficiency of human-robot collaboration. The researchers conducted two sets of experiments ("Predict the speed-dating outcomes and get up to $6 (takes less than 20 min)" and a similar Prolific experiment) in which participants interacted with the AI system in a task of predicting the outcome of a dating to explore the impact of model explainability and feedback on user trust in AI and prediction accuracy. The results show that although explainability (e.g., global and local interpretation) does not significantly improve trust, feedback can most consistently and significantly improve behavioral trust. However, increased trust does not necessarily lead to the same level of performance gains, i.e., there is a "trust-performance paradox". Exploratory analysis reveals the mechanisms behind this phenomenon. outcome

A1: According to research, feedback (e.g. result output) is a key factor influencing user trust. It is the most significant and reliable way to increase user trust in AI behavior.

A3: The study found that the feedback of the results can improve the accuracy of the user's predictions (reducing the absolute error), thereby improving the performance of working with AI. However, interpretability does not have as much impact on user task performance as it does on trust. This may mean that we should pay more attention to how to effectively use feedback mechanisms to improve the usefulness and effectiveness of AI-assisted decision-making. summary A3: The study found that the feedback of the results can improve the accuracy of the user's predictions (reducing the absolute error), thereby improving the performance of working with AI. However, interpretability does not have as much impact on user task performance as it does on trust. This may mean that we should pay more attention to how to effectively use feedback mechanisms to improve the usefulness and effectiveness of AI-assisted decision-making.

solution

被抢劫的乐趣

Draw inferences

Problem finding

不可思议的黑洞

变异编年史

边缘日记

白雪公主和七个小矮人

爸爸男人走路

A1: According to research, feedback (e.g. result output) is a key factor influencing user trust. It is the most significant and reliable way to increase user trust in AI behavior.

artificial intelligence

比尔和泰德畅游鬼门关

白车惊魂

solution

thesis

不法之徒约翰尼·布莱克

宝藏圣诞节

Personal insights

贝弗利山人

Translation

Dissertation Summary

白头神探3

白头神探2

白头神探